View Full Version : MBAM and SD conflicts
scott27052
03-15-2009, 10:19 PM
I use SD (no AV) for real time protection, lately MBAM is taking MUCH longer to scan (free version), I disabled SD and everything was fine so there is some sort of conflict between the two. I know many people use both.
haapy
03-15-2009, 10:42 PM
As both products are continually being developed, it is posssible that there could be conflicts. I have not used MBAM in few months.
Whenever I use backup scanners (Avira, Malwarebytes, etc.) I always disable SD. Just a good practice.
haapy
03-16-2009, 05:58 AM
I just ran some tests
Full MBAM scan with SD/AV/BG active... 15.58 minutes.
Full MBAM scan with SD/AV/BG disabled... 13.36 minutes.
Not a big degradation.
AChen
03-17-2009, 10:36 PM
Hi Guys,
SD is monitoring running processes and active files which will cause bytes to take longer per file checked.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.